Butch
On February 11,
On Valentine’s Day,
Leavin’ the Game on Luckie Street would have been a perfect live document, except for a nearly fatal flaw. A live album is supposed to make the listener feel like they are at the show.
Butch
Butch
On February 11,
On Valentine’s Day,
Leavin’ the Game on Luckie Street would have been a perfect live document, except for a nearly fatal flaw. A live album is supposed to make the listener feel like they are at the show.
Butch
Every great theory begins with tremendous doubt. Galileo was condemned by the Catholic Church for his heliocentric view of the universe. Charles Darwin was labeled a heretic for his theory of evolution. Freud’s interpretation of his dreams was declared to be pseudo-science. As time went on, the controversy and doubt faded. These theories became the basis for modern science. The theory I am going to present in this essay will also be greeted with doubt, ridicule, and disbelief. However, I believe in it with every fiber of my being: Cheap Trick is the greatest rock n’ roll band that
“Cheap Trick? The ‘I Want You to Want Me’ band? John, are you out of your mind?”
This is the general reaction I get from friends and colleagues when I present this theory. I admit it seems a bit far-fetched. There are certainly bands that have sold more records than Cheap Trick. There are bands that have had more hits and have sold out more arenas than Cheap Trick. Hell, there are bands that are more popular than Cheap Trick. I am aware of all these factors, but I still say that Cheap Trick is
Rock n’ roll has existed for half a century. In those 50 years,
March, 2003: It’s a gorgeous day in early spring and I am standing under the marquee of The Recher Theatre in downtown
Doors open at 7:00 PM, and I take my usual spot in the front row. I am minding my own business when I feel a tap on my shoulder. I turn around and see a man about my dad’s age. He even looks like my dad: Button down shirt, khaki pants, glasses. His most distinguishing feature is his jacket: A vintage satin baseball jacket with the Cheap Trick logo on the back.
“Is this your first time brother?” he asks with a grin.
“Yup. Are they any good live?” I sheepishly ask.
“Unfuckingbelivable,” Almost-Dad says. “You are going to be blown away my man. I first saw them when I was your age, and I had no idea who they were. I was so impressed I bought the jacket.”
In my experience, adding the word “fucking” to an adjective usually means that you are about to see something monumental. The fact that the word came from my dad’s long lost brother confirmed it. This guy obviously used such words sparingly, and the fact that Cheap Trick warranted an obscenity was intriguing.
The house lights go down. Almost-Dad begins to pump his fists in the air and lets out a mighty “YEAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!” He’s not the only one. These fans are in complete and total ecstasy, and a note hasn’t even been played. This is commitment.
Guitarist Rick Nielsen and drummer Bun E. Carlos appear onstage first, followed by bassist Tom Petersen and lead singer Robin Zander. They tear into “Hello There,” and I am absolutely mesmerized. These guys are the same age as my parents, but are performing with the passion of a band in their early ‘20s. Robin Zander’s British Invasion-style vocals sound exactly like they do on the records. Rick Nielsen looks and acts like a crazy uncle, jumping around and telling dirty jokes in between songs. Tom Petersen stands in the background looking pretty, while Bun E. Carlos holds it together with his simple, steady drum beat.
The music is three decades old, but sounds as if it was written yesterday. Even though I don’t know any songs besides “I Want You to Want Me” and “Surrender,” I find myself singing along. The tight harmonies and heavy guitar riffs go together like peanut butter and chocolate. This is one helluva band.
The week before, I saw The Used at
The show ended with “Surrender,” and when the band left the stage Almost-Dad tapped me on the shoulder again.
“Whadja think Bro?” he asked.
“Amazing,” I breathlessly replied. “Absolutely amazing!”
“Toldja!”
With that, Almost-Dad left, his Cheap Trick jacket waving me goodbye.
I left the Recher and went around to where the tour bus was parked. I didn’t have anything cool for them to sign; I just wanted to tell them what I thought. After awhile, Robin Zander emerged from the bus. He flashes me his million-dollar smile and comes over. I sheepishly give him a piece of notebook paper to sign and he obliges.
“Y-you guys were really great tonight,” I said, aware that I was in the presence of greatness.
“Thanks,” he replied. “I appreciate you coming out.”
He shakes my hand before attending to the other fans waiting for an audience.
Rick Nielsen comes out next, and flashes me his demonic grin. As he signs the paper I ask him a question.
“Can I take a picture of you?”
“Yeah man! Snap away!”
I take out my Kodak disposable camera and take a picture of Rick gritting his teeth like a deranged R. Crumb character.
I immediately went out and bought the core of the Cheap Trick canon: Cheap Trick, In Color, Heaven Tonight and At Budokan. As I got deeper into their catalog, I wondered why Cheap Trick was not in the pantheon of great American rock n’ roll. It seemed odd that a band like Aerosmith was lauded with massive critical respect, but Cheap Trick languished in the Recher Theatres of the world. I wondered why.
June, 2006: Record and Tape Traders. It’s my weekly trip to the record store. While thumbing through the new releases, I stumble upon
I listened to
I realized that this was a ridiculous statement the moment I made it to myself, but the more I thought about it, the more it made sense. Like an evangelical preacher, I began preaching my theory, and was labeled a heretic. Maybe I am a heretic, but my argument stands on solid ground.
One of the pillars of American life is consumerism. From the moment Cheap Trick was conceived in Rick Nielsen’s wonderfully warped mind, they were already a brand. The ingenious stamp logo was plastered on everything from t-shirts to panties as early as 1976. To move the merch, the band created a subtle but effective image for themselves. Pretty boys Robin Zander and Tom Petersen were strategically placed up front, their adorable Midwestern faces greeting impressionable fans from an album cover. The not-so-pretty Nielsen and drummer Bun E. Carlos were relegated to the back. This strategy not only sold records, it gave the band personality. Personality was scarce in the late ‘70s rock scene, and the band stood out.
This strategy especially worked in
However, Cheap Trick’s image was much more than a marketing ploy. Early press releases featured fabricated stories of exotic backgrounds and exaggerated deeds. This was meant to give Cheap Trick a level of mystique that few bands had in the mid-‘70s. They were touted as a band without a past, and any journalist that attempted to get information out of them were promptly given a more outrageous story than the last.
Consumerism and branding are an aspect of American culture that Cheap Trick has mastered, but musically it is a bit hard to make a case. Each one of the bands that I mentioned in my introduction have a distinctly American sound. Aerosmith plays blues-influenced hard rock. Tom Petty plays electrified folk. The Dead is heavily influenced by jazz, while Sknyrd and the Eagles are influenced by the sounds of the south.
Cheap Trick is from the
The majority of Trick’s musical influence comes from
Finally, Cheap Trick’s music is totally devoid of the pretension that plagues most great American rock bands. All of them play completely unpretentious music, yet when you talk to them, they act as if they are talking about writing Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony. When Steven Tyler talks about writing “Dream On,” he talks with reverence about how that song launched a thousand make-outs. That’s all well and good, but it’s just another garden variety power ballad. It’s not like he wrote “In My Life” or “God Only Knows.” He has completely fallen for his own hype machine. It’s incredibly lame to see a nearly 60 year old man pretend to be relevant when his last decent record came out in 1979 (I am aware that Aerosmith is far more popular now than they were in the ‘70s, but I refuse to consider sober Aerosmith Aerosmith.) . Meanwhile, if you ask Rick Nielsen about “Surrender,” there is no pretension. He will tell you that it is a kick-ass rock song and then proceed to play it, complete with five-necked guitar.
In many ways, Cheap Trick is the embodiment of
August, 2007. Virgin Festival. It is 105 degrees in the front row. My throat is sore, I have a pounding headache, and my nose is running. I have gone through the two bottles of water that I was allowed to bring in. Fountains of
“But what about the Fratelli’s?” He asked.
“Trust me on this one.” I assured him.
The background music fades out, and the MC introduces the band. I realize that I have stepped into the role of Almost-Dad, and Jon is my pupil. The band steps onto the stage one by one, with Robin appearing last. I look up at Jon, who has skepticism written all over his face. I wait with baited breath for the first power chord, because once he hears that, it’s all over. The band tears in to “Hello There.” I look up at Jon, who is now picking his jaw up off the floor.
After a blistering 45-minute set, Cheap Trick leaves the stage. I am mentally and physically drained. Jon stares into space for a few seconds, and then speaks.
“I don’t know about you, but I think that kicked ass.”
The cycle begins again.
The final word count was 4,011. I had never written anything so epic. I e-mailed the piece to my editor, and took a deep breath. I was exhausted. I put aside everything in my life to focus on that article. I locked myself in my room and lived on a steady diet of Goldfish and Mountain Dew, pausing occasionally to sleep and shower. For one month, I was consumed with Elvis Aron Presley.
Elvis and I have a long and complicated history. When I was in the third grade, my dad came home with a box of records that he inherited from an elderly client. The records were pretty terrible. My dad went through the box, periodically rescuing treasures and commenting on the oddity of the collection: “Who in their right mind buys two Dr. Demento albums?”
I didn’t have any interest in anything that contained “I’m My Own Grandpa,” but two records caught my eye. The covers featured a man wearing a white-sequined jumpsuit and a helmet of black hair. The man apparently had one name: Elvis. At eight years old, I had a vague idea of who Elvis Presley was. I had never heard any of his music, but I knew that he was pretty important. I put the record on, and the moment I heard “Jailhouse Rock,” everything clicked. My friends listened to bands like The Spin Doctors, Counting Crows and Toad the Wet Sprocket, but I immersed myself in the music of the King.
As I grew older, I moved on. I stopped listening to Elvis all together and moved my posters down to the basement. In my late teens, I even subscribed to the revisionist theory that Elvis was nothing more than a wilder version of Pat Boone. I didn’t understand his impact. Sure his ‘50s work was fantastic, but pap like “It’s Now or Never?” The terrible films where he always seemed to be playing a race car driver? How could he be considered the king of anything, let alone rock n’ roll?
I don’t think anyone from our generation can truly grasp what an impact Elvis had on our culture. We’ve grown up in a world where sex is no longer a dirty word. When Elvis hit the national stage in 1956, male singers stood stoically at the microphone crooning sweet ballads and novelty songs. Elvis threw that notion out the window with swiveling hips and a hiccupping vocal. Male singers had never been sexy, and in the conformist world of the mid-‘50s, that was threatening. His sneer still implies danger a half century later.
Unfortunately the image that most people have of Elvis Presley is not the “Hillbilly Cat,” of 1956. Elvis’ fall was so stunning that people only think of him a fat drug addict who died in his bathroom. To place him in that box is not only insulting to the man, but also insulting to our culture. Elvis gave us some of the greatest music of the 20th century, and we take it for granted. We take it for granted because it has always been there. However, there was a time when it wasn’t there. Elvis Presley is the root of all modern music. Everyone has been influenced by him, consciously or unconsciously. As legendary rock critic Lester Bangs once said, “Elvis threw “Doggie in the Window” out the window, and the rest of us are still reeling from the impact.”
I decided to write about Elvis because I wanted to understand his impact. I have a firmer grasp on it, but I don’t think I’ll ever fully appreciate it. However, I am fully aware of one thing: Elvis’ early records encapsulate everything that is wonderful about rock n’ roll. He will never leave the building.
When critics discuss Van Halen, they usually focus on their self-titled debut or the multi-platinum juggernaut of 1984. This makes a lot of sense, because those records sum up everything that was great about Van Halen. The riffs, the songs, and the attitude were perfectly in place. Both records established the myth that Van Halen was
The early Van Halen records follow an arc. Van Halen I and II show a young, hungry rock band desperate for stardom. The songs are carefree, energetic and eager to please. On Women and Children First, Van Halen are legitimate rock stars, indulging in all the spoils. A year later, the stardom was beginning to take its toll. Fair Warning shows a band under considerable strain. It is not so much an album, but a war between two dominant personalities.
The tension between David Lee Roth and Eddie Van Halen has always been the force behind Van Halen. Their partnership follows an age-old rock n’ roll cliché: The extroverted showman and the guitarist with mystique. Roth and Eddie were able to keep the peace for three albums, but by Fair Warning they were jockeying for position.
Eddie’s intense solo in the beginning of “
Eddie’s guitar is the most dominant trait on Fair Warning. Roth attempts to rise above it with his usual chatty banter, but Eddie’s guitar chops him down to earth with a blast of distortion. Eddie’s guitar solos are still technically brilliant, but are much more focused. The signature hammer-ons, pull-offs and two hand tapping are structured so every note means something.
Eddie’s tougher guitar sound gives way to tougher songs. David Lee Roth tries hard to keep up his heavy metal lounge singer persona, but it seems transparent. “Dirty Movies” is the most obvious example of this. On an earlier record, this song would have been a joyous ode to adult entertainment. On Fair Warning, Diamond Dave is clearly getting sick of hotel room VCRs loaded with the finest in silicone based cinema.
Fair Warning’s greatest moment comes in the middle. If “Unchained” is not the best song Van Halen ever recorded, it is certainly the heaviest. It is the one moment on the album where Eddie and Dave come together. Eddie’s riff tries to subdue Dave, but Dave’s personality finally breaks through with a triumphant “ALLLLRIIIIGHT!” When Dave says that line, you can imagine him jumping off a drum riser. It is the most vivid moment of the Roth era.
Fair Warning is the lost album of the David Lee Roth era. It is an album of anger, resentment and weariness sandwiched between albums about pretty women and dancing in the street. Fair Warning gave us the real Van Halen, not the myth that we all wanted to see. This was Van Halen unchained.
It’s easy to view Sebastian Bach’s new album with a haze of cynicism. Bach is in the middle of a publicity windfall thanks to his appearance on MTV’s Celebrity Rap Superstar, so a new record seems very convenient. However, Angel Down has been in the works for seven years, and is Bach’s first real solo record since leaving Skid Row in 1996. Although 1998’s Bring ‘Em Bach Alive contained five new songs, it was mostly a live record, with Baz shouting out Skid Row classics. The new songs were decent enough, but contained little of the fire of his previous band.
Angel Down is Sebastian Bach’s triumphant return to the metal throne. Bach has not sounded this focused since 1995’s Subhuman Race. With its lean production and razor sharp guitar riffs, Angel Down is almost an extension of that record. Bach’s titanium pipes are still in tact and he hits every high note effortlessly. Many of these songs have been floating through Bach’s live sets for several years, and they reach their full potential here.
The title track continues the grand metal tradition of a soft intro followed by a roaring chorus. This technique has been used by so many bands that it could easily morph into self-parody. Bach diffuses the cliché by using the intro as a warning. Once the guitars kick in, the song does not let go. The band spends about ten seconds on the opening riff before Bach comes in with a devastating roar.
One of the more puzzling aspects of Angel Down is the presence of Axl Rose. Rose comes out of his artistic coma to lend his voice to three tracks. Rose is in surprisingly good form vocally, but his contributions are a mixed bag. He fits in well with the album’s ridiculously titled first single, “Love is a B*tchslap,” a gleefully chauvinistic romp that sounds like a leftover from Appetite for Destruction. The lyrics cannot be repeated here, but it is impossible to take them seriously.
The album’s only misfire is Bach’s cover of Aerosmith’s “Back in the Saddle.” The song is performed as a duet with Axl Rose, and the dynamic duo completely misinterpret the song. The raunchy blues groove of the original is mutated into generic heavy metal. Every element of this song is out of place, from Bach’s overdrawn screaming to an embarrassingly metallic solo. When have you heard Joe Perry play a million notes in rapid succession? That’s right. You haven’t.
Fortunately, “Back in the Saddle” is one weak moment in an album of greatness. Angel Down won’t change the world and doesn’t have anything particularly “important” to say, it’s just a heavy metal record. Bach’s loyalty to the genre is part of what makes Angel Down such an enjoyable listen. This has everything you want out of a metal album: It’s fun, unpretentious and sounds best when played at high volumes. Sebastian no longer has the youth, but he remains forever wild.
One look at the Rock n’ Roll Stormtroopers tells you what kind of band they are. The clichés are all present and accounted for. There’s hellfire, cutoff denim vests, devil horns and several assurances that this record will rock your face off. All of this is extremely charming and somewhat reassuring, because as Twisted Sister once put it: We all wanna rock. Unfortunately, On Fire doesn’t deliver. My face is still present and accounted for.
The main problem with On Fire is that the Stormtroopers are too self-aware. They know the image is ridiculous and every song is delivered with a wink and a nod. There is nothing wrong with being in on the joke, but there has to be at least one serious element. For example, 90% of AC/DC’s lyrical content is utterly ridiculous, but Angus Young’s guitar work keep them from being court jesters. The Stormtroopers don’t have that, and the shtick gets old very quickly.
The Stormtroopers’ saving grace is their boundless enthusiasm. Lead singer Tex Tornado (How’s that for a rock n’ roll name?) and the boys sound like they are having a great time. The band’s heavy German accents also set them apart from a million other bands, simply because you don’t often hear such heavy accents within this genre. Unfortunately this positive trait is undercut by static production that sucks the energy out of the songs
The album’s opening track, “Bulldozers on the Loose,” sets the tone for the entire record. Tornado repeats the title of the song for a minute or so, before crooning some generic lyrics about mindless destruction. Repeat chorus. Add in a few uninspired AC/DC riffs and you have the crux of the Stormtrooper sound. “Bulldozers on the Loose” is a catchy tune, but only because the chorus is repeated ad nauseam. Every other song on the record follows this basic template, with a few minor changes to mix things up a bit. The three themes: Rock, parties, and the almighty power of rock.
The Stormtroopers have the basic idea of party rock down but they fail to understand what makes it work. It’s not really about being original, but about taking the clichés and putting your own twist on them. All the elements are in place, but the Stormtroopers haven’t figured out how to make the genre their own.
Despite these minor setbacks, the Rock n’ Roll Stormtroopers have a lot of potential. If they lose some of the shtick and tighten up their songwriting, they could be a force in the sleaze rock scene. As it stands, they are all smoke and no fire.
How do you start listening to The Who? This sounds like a stupid question right? Tommy, Who’s Next or Quadrophenia would probably be typical answers. Those records are incredible works of art and showed how far rock n’ roll could be taken. As great as those records are, they would not be a good place to begin. Why? The complexity of those records can be quite intimidating for a newcomer, and they would probably be turned off. A compilation would be a more logical choice.
Choosing a Who compilation is often more confusing than choosing a proper album. Most Who compilations tend to focus on their arena rock heyday, virtually ignoring their early singles. Instead of getting a balanced view of the band’s musical career, the listener is only hearing one side. Fortunately, one compilation distills everything great about the Who into a single disc.
Meaty Beaty Big and Bouncy is one of the best compilations in the history of rock n’ roll. Unlike the later Who compilations, Meaty Beaty Big and Bouncy has a purpose. Like their contemporaries The Beatles and The Rolling Stones, The Who’s early singles were never released on an actual album. Therefore this record was intended to collect all those early singles in one handy place.
Although it was a greatest hits collection in
All of the major singles are here, from “I Can’t Explain” through “Pinball Wizard.” The songs are very poppy and on the surface seem like the typical British Invasion sound. The jangly guitars, high harmonies and catchy hooks are abundant, but the lyrical content sets them apart from peers like The Dave Clark Five. Although Pete Townshend was still finding his voice as a writer, his trademark vulnerability runs through the seemingly happy tunes. He is insecure in “Substitute,” (“I’m a substitute for another
The other element that sets The Who apart is the manic drumming of Keith Moon. In a time when drummers played simple beats, Moonie bashed the entire kit. His drumming gives the music a propulsive energy that other bands of the era can’t match.
This energy is the reason why Meaty Beaty Big and Bouncy holds up better than other Who compilations. There is a visceral thrill in hearing The Who when they young, hungry and trying to prove themselves. Their music became louder and more complex, but The Who never rocked as hard as they did on these early singles. There is no pretension on this record, just maximum R&B.
You think you know Rod Stewart, but you have no idea. There was a time when he didn’t sing torch songs to middle aged housewives. There was also a time when he didn’t strut around in pink spandex asking if he was sexy. There was a time in the not-so-distant past when Rod Stewart was….dare I say…cool. For a generation that has only heard his milquetoast ballads or his innocuous pop songs, this may be hard to believe.
Rod Stewart has been making mediocre records for so long that it is easy to forget how good he really is. Released in 1971, Every Picture Tells a Story is what Rod Stewart is capable of when he is motivated. The album is the perfect blend of impeccable song selection, musicianship, and interpretation. Musically, Every Picture Tells a Story is hard to define. The acoustic instrumentation is from the folk tradition, but Stewart and his band are purely rock n’ roll. After a few listens, Stewart’s approach becomes obvious: Rock n’ roll and folk music are the same.
This delicate balance is kept in check by Stewart’s backing band, led by Faces guitarist Ronnie Wood. Most singer/songwriter albums from this period use quiet, reflective arrangements. Wood tosses this unwritten rule aside, playing his acoustic guitar as if it was electric. Drummer Mick Waller also ignores the conventions of the genre, pounding the drums with reckless passion.
The band is the perfect compliment to Stewart’s emotive singing. His whiskey soaked vocal cords are an acquired taste, but they have a surprising amount of range. He goes from being a nervous teenager on the title track (“I combed my hair in a thousand ways/but I came out looking just the same”), to heartbroken in “Seems Like a Long Time,” (“Hard times are only the other side of good times”) and is able to make both convincing.
When most people think of this album, they immediately think of “Maggie May,” which has been played into oblivion thanks to classic rock radio. Overexposure aside, the song still packs a punch thanks to the Stewart’s “lovable rogue” persona. He would exploit this aspect of his personality for the next three decades and gradually use it as a crutch. The Rod Stewart sleeping with Maggie Mae is not the slimy cad of later songs like “Tonight’s the Night.” Rod sounds completely innocent as he comments that the morning sun really shows her age. Unfortunately, “Maggie Mae” was such an iconic song, Stewart unwittingly typecast himself.
“Maggie May” gets all the press, but the unsung highlight of the album is Stewart’s show stopping cover of The Temptations’ “I’m Losing You.” Backed up by his mates in The Faces, Stewart manages to out-tempt The Temptations. Stewart sounds as if his heart is being ripped out of his chest, as the band chugs along. The album’s best moment comes at the end of the song. Just as the band begins to fade out, they come roaring back for one final tear-stained chorus.
Every Picture Tells a Story is proof that you can’t judge an artist for their latter day sins. This record is timeless, and yet people tend to remember his most dated work (“Infatuation” anyone?). Listening to this album, you realize why Rod Stewart is so revered. Does Rod Stewart have a good record left in him? Let’s hope so, because he is too talented to be a lounge singer.
One of the best things about being a music fan is the homemade music mix. I’m not talking about putting an iPod on shuffle and randomly putting songs on a disc. A true mix requires thought, sweat and a lot of frustration. The process has gotten slightly easier thanks to the CD burner, but making a mix can be a frustrating ordeal. In this week’s column, I will try to alleviate some frustration.
Step One: Start With A Bang
The first track of the mixtape should grab the listener’s attention. If you start with a ballad, there is a high probability that the listener will get bored and not listen to the rest. Therefore, it’s always best to start with an up-tempo number, because it gets the listener involved in the record. It also sets the tone for the rest of the tape. If you have a really great opener, the chances of a great tape dramatically improve.
Step Two: Cool It Down
Now that you have attention, you need to bring things down a bit. This does not mean you come out with ballad guns blazing. The third track is a good time to break out a mid-tempo song. It gives the listener time to recover from the opening onslaught and sets up the next up-tempo song. Here is an example. If I were making an AC/DC mix, I would open up with the double whammy of “Whole Lotta Rosie” and “Girl’s Got Rhythm.” Then I would cool things down with “The Jack,” which is the perfect lead in to “Givin’ the Dog a Bone.” Remember: The listener needs to catch their breath.
Step Three: Album Tracks Are Your Friend!
Let’s say you were making a Beastie Boys mix for someone who had never heard them before. Obviously you would need to include “Fight for Your Right” and “Sabotage.” However, The Beasties’ best work has always been the non-singles. Shake it up a bit! Use stuff like “Slow and Low,” or “Shake Your Rump” or “Johnny Royal.” “Fight For Your Right” is great, but it’s been done a million times. By using album tracks to your advantage, you introduce someone to songs they would never hear on the radio.
Step Four: Make Sure It Flows!
.You can have the best tracklist in the world, but if it doesn’t flow, it doesn’t work. How do you avoid bad flow? Every time you add a new track, listen to 30 seconds of the track that came before. Then listen to 30 seconds of the new track. Then ask yourself: “Do these go together?” If not, it’s no big deal. Either delete the track, or move it to a different spot. Before you burn the disc, give it a full listen. However, it should be noted that proficiency in this step comes with experience. If you don’t get it the first couple of times, don’t be discouraged.
Making a mix is not easy, but I think it is an important skill. You learn a lot about music, because it forces you to think about how each song fits within the context of a record. It’s also a great way to make friends and to introduce someone to music that they have never been exposed to. But most importantly: It’s a lot of fun.
Chaz Matthews has to be given credit for one thing: It takes a lot of balls to be a one man band. If the record sucks, you can only blame yourself. Matthews accepts this challenge with Amazing Graceless, his first solo record since the breakup of the Dimestore Haloes. The risk doesn’t pay off.
The logic behind this record was quite simple. Matthews was dealing with his personal demons, wrote a bunch of songs, and wanted to get them out. This approach often results in a classic album, because it is written and recorded in the heat of the moment. The problem with Amazing Graceless is not the music itself. Matthews is a talented songwriter, and the songs are some of the best of his career. He has a remarkable ability to put the listener in his shoes. You feel the pain, the angst and his desperation. When he croons “I need a fix and your kiss,” in “Girl From Detox,” he’s not just referencing The New York Dolls. So if the songs are good, how come the record gets a low rating?
The production on Amazing Graceless nearly kills the listening experience. One of the most appealing things about the Dimestore Haloes was Matthews’ knack for writing addictive guitar riffs. The riffs are still there, but you have to listen really hard to find them. The guitars are a buzzing wall of white noise, and it takes two or three listens before you find the riff. Matthews also makes the mistake of using a drum machine, which makes the drumbeats nearly inaudible.
The production is so bad that the sound quality fluctuates from track to track. On one track the vocals are louder than the guitar, on another the guitar drowns out the vocal. The bass is non-existent. You end up listening to the album in chunks, because you can’t take it all at once. Matthews’ ambitious decision to produce his own record and play all the instruments is admirable, but couldn’t he have ponied up the cash for a real producer and a drummer? Instead of listening to the songs, you end up thinking “Wow, I bet this sounds amazing live.”
Ultimately Amazing Graceless is an album of “What if’s?” What if The Dimestore Haloes recorded this song? How would this sound with a real drummer? Where is the bass guitar? Raw production is a good thing for punk rock, but you should be able to listen to the songs. Amazing Graceless is proof that just a little production goes a very long way.